Letter to Investors – Mar’23 – Extracts



    • Adjusted trailing twelve months’ earnings of underlying portfolio companies grew by 11%.
    • FY23 NAV fell by 4.3% with 70% funds invested. NSE Nifty 50 and Nifty 500 grew by 0.6% and -1.2% respectively.
    • We made one mistake that cost us 1% of AUM. Details inside.
    • We added to tracking position in one company and made it a major position. Detailed thesis was shared with investors.
    • Regime changing from TINA to TANIA is leading to flight to safety.
    • Stance: Neutral

Dear Fellow Investors,


“Risk means more things can happen than will happen”

-Elroy Dimson

In a rising market, most investment/ trading styles do well despite overpaying. For, money gushing into any asset class can raise its price irrespective of underlying value. Prudence and safety are needless, even penalised during such times. But like most good things, such good runs – even if they extend over a long time – eventually reverse. Waking up to build controls after such reversal is too late.

The decade old world wide party-tide of low interest rates that raised all asset prices is ebbing. Not only has it brought down risky pockets like crypto and expensive tech/ growth/ IPO stocks, but even those exposed to otherwise deemed risk-free assets like US government securities (two regional US banks that held US government securities have been closed). As they say, risk is what is left after you have thought through everything.

Portfolio safety is like a car’s seat belt. Both are minor irritants in good times, but life-saving during accidents. Just as it is prudent to always wear seat belts tolerating minor discomfort, it is important to control risk in portfolios even in good times tolerating lower relative returns.

Our preferred way to reduce risk in the portfolio is to buy a diversified set of good companies cheaply and hold them till they remain good and don’t get super expensive. Yes, there is an inherent conflict in this goal. Markets have become more efficient and everyone is trying to do the same. So good companies donot come cheap. Mostly. But there are two pockets where mispricings are common. First is temporary hardships either in the world, country, sector or company during which even good companies get traded at throw away prices. And second is smaller companies which are not so well tracked and/ or are less liquid and can remain mispriced.

Doing the above is easy in theory but difficult in practice. We need to exercise discipline and have safety margin in all the three components – (a) diversified uncorrelated positions, (b) good companies, and (c) reasonable valuations.

And while doing the above, there are bouts of luck and mistakes. Many times, probable outcomes don’t happen and/ or improbable outcomes happen. Often we get good outcomes beyond our expectations due to plain good luck. These times call for humility and trimming positions that get super expensive. Conversely despite doing the right thing our positions can fall. If there is no material deterioration in underlying fundamentals, these are times not for despondency or self-pity, but raising our bets. Lastly, we make mistakes; they are normal in a pursuit of higher than risk-free returns. When we make mistakes, mention of their cumulative account precedes that of achievements so that we don’t lose the lessons.

When evaluating our performance, please see whether or not we have bought good companies at good prices. Also see whether we have behaved appropriately while going through good or bad luck. Lastly, see if our mistakes were new (pardonable) or repeat of old (unpardonable).  Our letters try to help you do that. Looking only at trailing short term return may not give full picture.




A1. Statutory PMS Performance Disclosure

Portfolio FY23  FY22 FY 21  FY 20* Since Inception* Outper-formance Cash Bal.
CED Long Term Focused Value (PMS) -4.3% 14.9% 48.5% -9.5% 11.2% 30.0%
NSE Nifty 500 TRI (includes dividends) -1.2% 22.3% 77.6% -23.6% 14.3% -3.1% NIL
NSE Nifty 50 TRI (includes dividends) 0.6% 20.3% 72.5% -23.5% 13.5% -2.3% NIL
*From Jul 24, 2019; Since inception performance is annualised; Note: As required by SEBI, the returns are calculated on time weighted average (NAV) basis. The returns are NET OF ALL EXPENSES AND FEES. The returns pertain to ENTIRE portfolio of our one and only strategy. Individual investor returns may vary from above owing to different investment dates. Annual returns are audited but not verified by SEBI.


We were down marginally this year. Being in the same boat as yours, we did not charge any fees in FY23.

Many of our positions are sector leaders going through temporary hardships. They are trading at low/ reasonable valuations in light of their fundamentals. We have used this opportunity to add to these positions. Cash balance has fallen from high of 38% early this year to 30% currently including new inflows.


A2. Underlying business performance


Past Twelve Months Earnings per unit (EPU)2 FY 2023 EPU (expected)
Dec 2022 5.51 5.2-6.23
Sep 2022 (Previous Quarter) 5.4 5.2-6.3
Dec 2021 (Previous Year) 5.9
Annual Change 11%4
CAGR since inception (Jun 2019) 6%
1 Last four quarters ending Jun 2022. Results of Jun quarter are declared by Nov only. 2 EPU = Total normalised earnings accruing to the aggregate portfolio divided by units outstanding. 3 Please note: the forward earnings per unit (EPU) are conservative estimates of our expectation of future earnings of underlying companies. In past we have been wrong – often by wide margin – in our estimates and there is a risk that we are wrong about the forward EPU reported to you above. 4 Adjusted earnings.


Trailing Earnings: Adjusting for temporary losses in the base and current period, trailing twelve months Earnings Per Unit (EPU) of underlying companies grew by 11% (including effects of cash equivalents that earn ~5%). 

1-Yr Forward Earnings: We are retaining the last letter’s estimate of FY 23 earnings per unit to Rs 5.2-6.2. 


A3. Underlying portfolio parameters


Mar 2023 Trailing P/E Forward P/E Portfolio RoE Portfolio Turnover1
CED LTFV (PMS) 26.8x 25.5x 16.8%4 5.5%
NSE 50 21.1x2 15.1%3
NSE 500 20.4x2 13.7%3
1 ‘sale of equity shares’ divided by ‘average portfolio value’ during the year to date period. 2 Source: NSE. 3Source: Ace Equity. 4Excluding cash equivalents. 




Mistake: Music Broadcast Bonus Preference Shares (Special Situation)

We have a paper loss of 1% of AUM in a special situation that we participated in last quarter. This was about bonus (i.e. free) preference shares to the equity shareholders of Music Broadcast ltd.

Please note this is not a core equity position; it was a way – unsuccessful till now -to put our spare cash to temporary use. Such cases are called as “special situations” in investing parlance.

Music Broadcast runs the radio channel Radiocity. The newspaper group Jagran Prakashan is the parent of the company with a 74% stake. Radiocity announced bonus preference shares to its minority equity shareholders in the ratio of 1 bonus preference shares of FV of Rs 100 each for 10 shares of Music Broadcast (then CMP Rs 25). The bonus preference share were to be allotted for free. In simpler words any non-promoter shareholder holding shares worth Rs 250 was entitled to bonus shares worth 100 free (i.e. 40% of cost). Additionally, these preference shares will list on stock exchanges soon (we can sell in the market) and will be ultimately redeemed @ Rs 120 in 3 years.

Think of bonus preference shares as delayed dividend. Instead of paying immediately, the company will distribute the sum after 3 years (at 20% premium). Normally a dividend equal to 10% of market cap leads to fall of 10% in share price once the stock goes ex-dividend. Given that these bonus shares are being given to minority shareholders that hold only 26% stake, post record date the stock price should fall by 40% of 26% i.e. 10.4%.

We made a 3.5% allocation to Music Broadcast at price of Rs 26.6 per share to play this special situation. Even if price were to fall 30% once stock goes ex-date we would have made 12% in a couple of months.

Or so we thought! In reality, post the ex-date, while we got the free bonus shares (worth 38% of our cost), the equity share actually is down 59% as of this writing. Even if we go back to the price of Rs 17.7 on Oct 22, 2020 when the bonus was first announced, the stock has fallen 39% from then price.

The only explanations can be that (a) bonus was already in price way before we thought and/ or (b) owing to low liquidity and rush to sell the main equity shares after ex-date, the stock has corrected steeply.

Now that reality has not turned as we had imagined, should we sell the equity shares immediately? Four reasons require us to pause. First, free cash will form over 75% of market capitalisation (including preference shares) of the company. Second, this is pre-election year which is normally good for Radiocity’s advertising revenues. Third, management has been pro-shareholders (Jagran Prakashan, the parent has done 8 buybacks in last 9 years).

And the forth reason is harvesting tax losses. If we hold this position for 9-12 months, (a) we claim tax loss on main equity shares (bonus stripping) and (b) have that as short term loss (15%) versus long term (10%). This means if we sell between 9-12 months, we can use 15% of the ‘notional’ loss to set off future capital gains. Notional because, it is not actual loss, we have received bonus preference shares for free in exchange. Nonethless, we will sell it before 9 months if we are getting a good price.

The bonus preference shares on the other hand will list shortly, and we will decide to sell, buy or hold based on the price at which they start trading.

Learnings – We should not leave such positions open. A perfect special situation is one when returns are locked irrespective of how market moves. So if similar situation was to take place in a stock that was also traded in futures & options (F&O) we could have sold the stock in futures and locked the gain. Second, we need to undertake special situations in companies that we would be okay to hold if things donot immediately turn the way we expect.


Previous mistakes (2014-2018): From our two past mistakes- “Cera Sanitaryware (2014)” and “2015-16” – we learnt that unless fundamentals are extremely compelling, it is better to be gradual in selling and buying respectively. From our past mistake on “Treehouse Education” we have learnt that bad management deserves a low price, it’s seldom a bargain. In Dish TV we underestimated the competitive disruption but thankfully sold at breakeven. Tata Motors DVR taught us that cyclical investing requires a different mindset to moat investing and one needs to be quick to act when external environment turns adverse. In Talwalkars, we learnt that assessing promoter quality is a difficult job and we should err on the side of caution irrespective of how cheap quantitative valuations look. From DB Corp we learned that industries in structural decline will fail to get high multiples even if the industry is consolidated, competition limited and free cash flows healthy. 


We increased our tracking position to a ~4% position in one of the companies. In addition we added to our position in four other companies as the prices became reasonable.




SVB and Flight to Safety

US based Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), 16th largest US bank by assets, closed down last quarter due to run on the bank. This was precipitated by rise in US interest rates from nil to over 4% within a year.

Concentration in deposit and loan book was the main mistake that SVB made. Here is the summary of what happened:

SVB had invested most of its deposits in long dated US government securities (bonds). Sharp rise in US interest rates led to mark to market losses on its bond portfolio (bond prices fall as interest rates rise). SVB had raised deposits from start-ups and they began pulling out deposits as venture capital dried up (again a fallout of rising interest rates). This forced SVB to sell bond portfolio at losses which nearly wiped out its equity capital. And then rumours led to run on the bank. US government guaranteed the deposit holders and closed the bank.

Globally, central banks including the US Fed are caught in the dilemma of maintaining financial stability and controlling inflation. We believe they will continue to safeguard bank depositors and keep interest rates high until inflation is firmly under control. Preference for safety over returns may, therefore, continue leading to moderation in global equity flows.


Back in India, retail flows including mutual fund SIPs continue to counter the selling by foreign investors. That partly helped Indian equity market remain insulated from global turmoil so far. As last 12-18 month returns turn negative, retail flow may moderate.  All this should mean that we will continue to get opportunities to deploy our spare cash in coming days ahead. Average valuation of last 10 year’s TINA (there is no alternative) regime may not be correct benchmark for upcoming TANIA (three are new investment alternatives) regime. We will be mindful of this while deploying.


An “investment” product to strongly avoid

 Rs 144 trillion. This is the size of India’s favourite financial savings instrument– bank fixed deposits. Rs 30 trillion. This is the next favourite instrument. Can you guess what is it? This is the size of savings plans of life insurance companies. This is twice the size of debt mutual funds in India and is 50% higher than combined sum held as current and savings deposits with banks.

A typical insurance savings product is pitched like this (LIC Bima Jyoti): Invest Rs 10,000 every month for 15 years. Get Rs 30 lacs at the end of 20 years. Get tax benefit under section 80C. Redemption proceeds are tax free as well.

What is not expressly told is that this will give a return of just 6.6% p.a. after GST and income tax benefits (assuming 30% tax bracket). And that there is a lock-in period of 5 years. Failure to pay premium in any of the first five years, not only will lead to loss of tax benefit but also attract surrender charges. Sadly, around 50% of people close their policies before 5 years and their net returns are much lower.

For such a long duration commitment there are better alternatives. A PPF that comes with similar benefits and 15 year term returns 7.1%. In fact, an ELSS (equity mutual funds that are eligible for section 80C benefits), which has just 3 year lock-in can return even higher. In last 20 years it has returned over 12% p.a. after tax. For death benefits a pure term insurance plan is much better. A Rs 1 crore cover can be obtained at an annual premium of around Rs 20,000.

It is extremely fascinating how the confluence of (a) high commissions, (b) tax benefits and (c) human fallacies have created such a colossal but nearly useless product. 

  • Life insurance savings products pay around 30% commissions to agents on first year premium and upto 15% from second year onwards. An agent will prefer selling these over a mutual fund that earns him just 1% for same investment garnered. That’s why your favourite finfluencer has started peddling these products in their “educational” Youtube channels. And that’s why your bank RM or distant relative talks so sweetly to you while suggesting investment options.
  • Life insurance products were given tax benefit so that more and more people secure financial safety of their dependents. The tax benefits were created envisaging pure term policies that only pay death benefit. However insurance companies have misused this benefit for creating FD like products.
  • Lastly, investors drop their guards as soon as they hear “guaranteed returns” and “tax benefits”. Many are not able to calculate the internal rate of return (IRR) embedded in these products. Finally, they rush to buy these products in March, just before the end of financial year without proper evaluation.

Best exit action for those stuck with such products, is to hold them till the lock in period of 5 years and then surrender the policies. This will help retain the tax benefit on redemption and minimise surrender charges.


As always, gratitude for your trust and patience. Kindly do share your thoughts, if any. Your feedback helps us improve our services to you!


Kind regards,

Team Compound Everyday Capital

Sumit Sarda, Surbhi Kabra Sarda, Punit Patni, Arpit Parmar, Sanjana Sukhtankar, Anand Parashar


Disclaimer: Compound Everyday Capital Management LLP is SEBI registered Portfolio Manager with registration number INP 000006633. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. All information provided herein is for informational purposes only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell securities. This transmission is confidential and may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Compound Everyday Capital Management LLP and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any security or investment product. Reference to an index does not imply that the firm will achieve returns, volatility, or other results similar to the index.


You may also like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *